2023 APPIC Match: Survey of Internship Applicants
This report contains the results from the survey of internship applicants who
were registered for the 2023 APPIC Match.
This survey was conducted via the internet between February 17 and March 19,
2023. All 3,955 applicants who registered for the 2023 APPIC Match were sent
an e-mail message (along with two reminder e-mails) about the availability of
the survey at a specific internet address. A total of 2,403 applicants (61%)
completed some or all of the survey.
Results of the survey are presented below. Missing data was eliminated, and
percentages do not necessarily total 100% due to rounding. Some survey items
requested open-ended comments about the AAPI, the Match, etc. that are not
reported below; however, those anonymous comments were reviewed by the
appropriate APPIC Board and/or committee members who are responsible
for each area.
Some of the more interesting findings from this survey include:
1. DEBT: Applicants mean reported debt load (see question 8) related to
graduate level study in psychology was:
All Students Mean = $ 86,481 USD Median = $50,000 USD
US Students: Mean = $ 90,598 USD Median = $60,000 USD
Canadian Students: Mean = $ 17,844 CAD Median = $0
A total of 27% of US students and 52% of Canadian students reported
no debt related to graduate study in psychology.
Please note that these figures do not include any additional
debt that these students may accrue during the remainder of
their graduate training (e.g., during internship).
2. VIRTUAL SELECTION: Questions 27-36 asked students about their
"Virtual Selection" experiences along with their preferences for
the future.
3. STIPENDS: Applicants matched to U.S. sites reported a mean
internship stipend of $35,478 USD, while applicants matched
to Canadian sites reported a mean stipend of $38,611 CAD. See
question 24.
4. NUMBER OF APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED: In Phase I, applicants who
applied only to U.S.-based internship sites submitted an
average of 15.2 internship applications, while students who applied
only to Canadian-based sites submitted an average of 9.8
applications. See question 14.
5. NUMBER OF INTERVIEW OFFERS RECEIVED: In Phase I, applicants who
applied only to U.S.-based internship sites received an average
of 8.0 interview offers, while students who applied only to
Canadian-based sites received an average of 6.0 offers. See
question 15.
6. FACTORS DEEMED IMPORTANT BY STUDENTS: Question 20 describes
the relative importance of various factors to students when
considering and ranking internship programs.
=========================================================================
1. Type of Doctoral Program
Clinical 1861 78 %
Counseling 267 11 %
School 170 7 %
Combined 90 4 %
Other 11 0 %
INTERPRETATION NOTE: A "combined" program could mean: (a) a doctoral
program that defines itself as a "combined" program (e.g., clinical-
school), or (b) an arrangement negotiated by a student in which he/she
integrates the curricula of two separate doctoral programs at his/her
school.
2. Degree Sought
Ph.D. 1361 57 %
Psy.D. 1038 43 %
Ed.D. 0 0 %
Other 2 0 %
3. Is your doctoral program ACCREDITED by one or more of the following
organizations? Check all that apply.
Yes - by APA (American Psychological Association) 2259 94 %
Yes - by CPA (Canadian Psychological Association) 135 6 %
Yes - by PCSAS (Psychological Clinical Science 135 6 %
Accreditation System)
No 17 1 %
4. Location of your doctoral Program
United States 2264 94%
Canada 138 6%
5. Were you ever previously enrolled in a psychology doctoral program
At Argosy University?
Yes 66 3 %
No 2331 97 %
6. Including the current (2022-2023) academic year, how many years
have you been enrolled in your CURRENT doctoral program (excluding
any time spent in other doctoral or masters programs):
This is my 2nd year 14 1%
This is my 3rd year 242 10%
This is my 4th year 1111 46%
This is my 5th year 764 32%
This is my 6th year 206 9%
This is my 7th year 46 2%
This is my 8th year 9 0%
This is my 9th year 1 0%
This is my 10th year 2 0%
This is my 11th (or 1 0%
later) year
7. Please check the item that best describes your status PRIOR to
entering your CURRENT doctoral program:
I had NO prior graduate-level training 1342 56%
I had a Master's degree in psychology 619 26%
I had a Master's degree in a mental health field 222 9%
other than psychology (e.g., counseling,
social work, marriage and family)
I had a Master's degree in an unrelated field 94 4%
I had been enrolled in a Master's program in 34 1%
psychology but did not receive a degree
I had been enrolled in a Master's program in a 9 0%
mental health field other than psychology
(e.g., counseling, social work, marriage and
family) but did not receive a degree
I had been enrolled in a Master's program in an 10 0%
unrelated field but did not receive a degree
Other, please specify 70 3%
8. Please estimate the total amount of DEBT that you have accrued
to date as a consequence of attending GRADUATE SCHOOL IN
PSYCHOLOGY, including tuition, fees, living expenses, books, etc.
Please include all forms of debt such as student loans, credit
cards, personal loans, etc. Please do NOT include undergraduate
debt or debt that is unrelated to your graduate training.
(All numbers for this item have been converted to U.S. dollars
unless otherwise noted)
All students:
Mean = $ 86,481 USD Median = $50,000 USD
SD = $105,110 USD
$0 694 30%
$1 - $49,999 USD 449 20%
$50,000 - $99,999 USD 279 12%
$100,000 - $149,999 USD 292 13%
$150,000 - $199,999 USD 210 9%
$200,000 - $249,999 USD 150 7%
$250,000 - $299,999 USD 79 3%
$300,000 - $349,999 USD 78 3%
$350,000 - $399,999 USD 29 1%
$400,000 - $449,999 USD 12 1%
$450,000 - $499,999 USD 8 0%
$500,000 USD or higher 17 1%
By country of doctoral program:
US Students: Mean = $ 90,598 USD Median = $60,000 USD
Canadian Students: Mean = $ 17,844 CAD Median = $0
The above calculations include students who reported no debt
(27% of U.S. students and 52% of Canadian students).
Virtually all applicants will remain in training for
at least 18 months (including the internship year) after the
completion of this survey and may incur additional debt
during that period.
9. Does your doctoral program allow you to apply to NON-ACCREDITED
Internship programs:
In Phase I? Yes = 587 (25%)
Yes, with special permission = 421 (18%)
No = 935 (39%)
Unsure = 448 (19%)
In Phase II? Yes = 532 (23%)
Yes, with special permission = 298 (13%)
No = 583 (26%)
Unsure = 857 (38%)
In the Post-Match Yes = 488 (22%)
Vacancy Service? Yes, with special permission = 197 (9%)
No = 357 (16%)
Unsure = 1207 (54%
NOTE: The results of this item should be interpreted cautiously,
as many students reported being unsure of their departmental
policies in this area.
10. Please check the item that applies to you (please respond even if
you withdrew from the Match or did not submit a Rank Order List):
This is my FIRST time participating 2337 97%
in the APPIC Match
This is my SECOND time participating 51 2%
in the APPIC Match
This is my THIRD time participating 4 0%
in the APPIC Match
This is my FOURTH time participating 2 0%
in the APPIC Match
Other 7 0%
11. Did you have any geographic restrictions on your internship
search that EITHER (a) reduced the number of sites to which you
applied, OR (b) kept you from applying to sites in which you
were interested?
Yes 1127 47 %
No 1276 53 %
The next two questions were only asked of respondents who
responded YES to the above item.
12. Which of the following best describes the reason for your
geographic restriction?
Significant family, financial, and/or 490 43%
health considerations
Personal preference (e.g., preferred 577 51%
place to live, to be near family or
friends, etc.)
Other 63 6%
13. Which of the following best describes your geographic
Restriction?
A single city or town, or within a 262 23%
100-mile radius of a city/town
State / Province 256 23%
Region of the country 467 42%
Other 139 12%
14. To how many internship sites did you apply in Phase I of
the APPIC Match (i.e., how many separate internship
applications did you submit)? Please separate your
responses into those submitted to US and Canadian
internship sites.
Applicants who submitted to US sites only:
Mean = 15.2 Median = 15
SD = 4.5 Mode = 15
Range = 1 - 46
Applicants who submitted to Canadian sites only:
Mean = 9.8 Median = 10
SD = 3.6 Mode = 12
Range = 2 - 20
NOTE: The AAPI service provided a financial disincentive
for applicants to submit more than 15 applications.
15. How many interviews of any kind (e.g., virtual, telephone, Zoom,
open house, in person) were you offered during Phase I?
Applicants who submitted only to US sites:
Mean = 8.0 Median = 8
SD = 4.1 Mode = 6
Range = 0 - 23
Applicants who submitted only to Canadian sites:
Mean = 6.0 Median = 6
SD = 3.3 Mode = 5
Range = 0 - 14
16. Considering all of the sites to which you applied in Phase I,
how many did NOT notify you of your interview status (e.g.,
received an interview, no longer under consideration) on or
before the "interview notification date" listed in their APPIC
Directory information?
All sites notified me in a timely manner 1517 66%
One site did NOT properly notify me 471 20%
Two sites did NOT properly notify me 184 8%
Three sites did NOT properly notify me 73 3%
Four or more sites did not properly notify me 64 3%
17. How many programs did you include on your final Rank Order List
in Phase I (i.e., how many program code numbers were listed)?
Mean = 8.0 Median = 7
SD = 4.6
NOTE: Use caution when comparing these numbers with the results
from questions 14-15, since some sites used multiple program code
numbers.
18. In general, how much impact did the COVID-related safety
precautions and policies of internship sites have on your
selection and ranking of programs?
Great Impact 54 2%
67 3%
Moderate Impact 293 13%
453 20%
No Impact 1450 63%
19. APPIC would like to know how much money you spent on various
aspects of the application and selection process for Phase I only.
APPLICATION COSTS involve preparing and submitting applications
to sites, and may include such items as the fee for the AAPI
service, obtaining official copies of transcripts, etc.
TRAVEL COSTS may include such items as air or train fare, car
rental, taxi, gasoline, hotel, etc.
OTHER COSTS may include such items as your Match registration
fee ($130), clothing costs, phone calls, internet service, etc.
Please enter your BEST ESTIMATE of the dollar amount spent, digits
only, in each of the following areas (e.g., one hundred dollars
US or Canadian would be entered as simply 100):
STUDENTS FROM U.S. DOCTORAL PROGRAMS
TOTAL COSTS: Mean = $ 835 USD
SD = 1086
Median = $ 680
APPLICATION COSTS: Mean = $ 629 USD
SD = 428
Median = $ 560
TRAVEL COSTS: Mean = $ 144 USD
SD = 878
Median = $ 0
OTHER COSTS: Mean = $ 122 USD
SD = 348
Median = $ 100
STUDENTS FROM CANADIAN DOCTORAL PROGRAMS
TOTAL COSTS: Mean = $ 624 CAD
SD = 272
Median = $ 630
APPLICATION COSTS: Mean = $ 522 CAD
SD = 218
Median = $ 542
TRAVEL COSTS: Mean = $ 2 CAD
SD = 16
Median = $ 0
OTHER COSTS: Mean = $ 130 CAD
SD = 155
Median = $ 130
NOTE: Pandemic-related changes to interview requirements
resulted in a dramatic reduction of travel costs as compared
to pre-pandemic years.
20. Please tell us how important each of the following factors
were to you when considering and ranking internship
programs:
Quality of the training experience 4.8
Feedback from current interns about their 4.5
experiences on internship
The interview experience 4.4
Work-life balance (e.g., number of hours 4.4
worked, expectations for working
after hours)
Emphasis on professional development 4.3
and mentorship
Emphasis on diversity, equity, and 4.2
inclusion training and support for
those with marginalized identities
Your impressions of the Training Director 4.1
The program's openness to feedback from 4.0
interns and willingness to act on
such feedback
Geographic limitations or preferences 3.9
Reputation of the program 3.9
Amount of the stipend 3.7
Congruence of the socio-political climate 3.7
in the area of the internship with my
own values and beliefs
Possibilities for staying at the site 3.6
after internship
Fringe benefits (e.g., health insurance, 3.5
paid time off, additional funds)
Physical safety in community in which the 3.4
internship is located
Protected research time 2.6
Opportunities to work from home 2.6
Family-friendly policies (e.g., parental 2.4
leave, child care)
21. Were you matched to an internship program by the APPIC Match?
(i.e., did your official notification from National Matching
Services [NMS] indicate that you were successfully matched to
an internship program?)
Yes 2066 89%
No 217 9%
Withdrew / No rankings submitted 38 2%
INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR INTERNSHIP
NOTE: Items 22-26 were asked only of applicants who reported having
matched to an internship site.
22. Location of the internship program to which you were matched:
United States 1935 94%
Canada 117 6%
23. Were you matched to an internship program that is CURRENTLY
accredited by APA or CPA?
Yes - Accredited by APA 1882 92 %
Yes - Accredited by CPA 94 5 %
No 75 4 %
24. Please enter the approximate amount of the annual stipend /
salary for your position (e.g., if your stipend is $20,000
US or Canadian for the year, enter "20000"). Please
estimate if you don't know the exact amount.
U.S. Sites: Mean = $35,478 (USD)
SD = $ 8,767 (USD)
Median = $35,000 (USD)
Mode = $35,000 (USD)
Canadian Sites: Mean = $38,611 (CAD)
SD = $ 6,010 (CAD)
Median = $35,000 (CAD)
Mode = $35,000 (CAD)
25. Please select the setting that best describes the internship
program to which you were matched:
Armed Forces Medical Center 29 1%
Child/Adolescent Psychiatric/Pediatrics 212 10%
Community Mental Health Center 220 11%
Consortium 165 8%
Medical School 254 12%
Prison/Other Correctional Facility 74 4%
Private General Hospital 90 4%
Private Outpatient Clinic 54 3%
Private Psychiatric Hospital 47 2%
Psychology Department 12 1%
School District 43 2%
State/County/Other Public Hospital 153 7%
University Counseling Center 257 13%
Veterans Affairs Medical Center 370 18%
Other 73 4%
26. What was the rank of the program to which you were matched?
(e.g., if you were matched to your top-ranked program, enter 1;
if you were matched to the second program on your list, enter 2)
1 1040 51 %
2 453 22 %
3 261 13 %
4 122 6 %
5 77 4 %
6 37 2 %
7 29 1 %
8 12 1 %
9 9 0 %
10 4 0 %
11 or higher 4 0 %
FEEDBACK ABOUT YOUR "VIRTUAL SELECTION" EXPERIENCE
For the following questions, "Virtual Selection" includes ALL
experiences and information sources that you used with intern sites
this year that were conducted remotely (e.g., via Zoom, Webex, Teams),
including interviews, tours, meetings with staff/supervisors/interns,
watching videos, etc.
27. Of the internship sites to which you applied, how many offered:
Only virtual interviews 9.4
Only in-person interviews 0.3
A choice of in-person or virtual 0.4
Virtual interview with option of 0.6
in-person open house
Other 0
28. How satisfied were you, overall, with the virtual selection processes
in which you participated?
Extremely Satisfied 899 41%
852 39%
Moderately Satisfied 385 17%
45 2%
Not at all Satisfied 31 1%
29. Indicate the degree to which the following were beneficial to you,
given the strong reliance on virtual selection this year
[Used a 5-point scale, 5=Extremely Beneficial, 1=Not at All Beneficial]
Ability to apply to a broader geographic area 4.1
than if interviews were in-person
Reduced costs for traveling 4.8
Reduced time spent traveling 4.8
Ease of managing/scheduling interviews 4.7
30. We are interested in learning about how effective the virtual
selection process was in providing you with the information you
needed to rank programs. How effective was the virtual selection
process in helping you to...
[Used a 5-point scale, 5=Extremely Effective, 1=Not at All Effective]
Understand programs' training experiences 4.2
Learn about the cities where the programs are located 3.0
Get a feel for the communities where the programs 2.7
are located
See the physical space of the institutions where 2.5
the programs are located
Get to know the training staff/supervisors 4.0
Get to discuss the programs with current trainees 4.4
Get a feel for the programs' overall culture 3.7
Get a feel for the programs' inclusivity and sensitivity 3.7
for diversity
31. Across all of your contacts with sites, how helpful was each of
these aspects of the Virtual Selection process? Leave the
question blank if it is not applicable to you.
[Used a 5-point scale, 5=Extremely Helpful, 1=Not at All Helpful]
Online brochures or websites 4.3
Communication and instructions about the virtual 4.2
interview process
Pre-recorded videos from the program staff 3.4
Virtual tours of the facilities (conducted live) 3.2
Tours of the facilities (pre-recorded) 3.5
Individual interviews with staff (you were the only 4.6
applicant present)
Group interviews with staff (interviews with more 3.2
than one applicant present)
Meetings with current interns 4.6
Interviews occurring within one day as opposed to 4.5
split across multiple days
Information orienting you to the geographic location/ 3.6
cities
32. Before the pandemic, many sites preferred or required applicants
to travel for on-site interviews. These experiences were often a
half- or full-day in length, required considerable travel, and
occurred at the applicant's expense (average of $1500 per student).
Given your experiences this year with the Virtual Selection process,
and given what you know or may have heard about on-site interview
experiences from previous years, assuming there is no pandemic which
interview format would you prefer?
Definitely Virtual 1641 75%
323 15%
No Preference 101 5%
71 3%
Definitely in Person 64 3%
33. In future years, if there is no pandemic, to what extent do you think
exclusive virtual interviews should be mandated for all psychology
internship programs?
Strong Preference: Mandated Virtual Interviews 1398 64%
447 20%
No Preference / Unsure 198 9%
62 3%
Strong Preference: Virtual Interviews Not Mandated 96 4%
34a. If you participated in a virtual interview at a program that also
offered an IN-PERSON INTERVIEW, how concerned would be that choosing
to not visit the site would negatively affect the program’s ranking
of you?
Very concerned 746 44%
288 17%
Moderately concerned 421 25%
94 5%
Not concerned at all 164 10%
34b. If you participated in a virtual interview at a program that also
offered an IN-PERSON OPEN HOUSE, how concerned would be that
choosing to not visit the site would negatively affect the
program’s ranking of you?
Very concerned 506 29%
267 15%
Moderately concerned 476 27%
241 14%
Not concerned at all 248 14%
35. To what extent has the pandemic impacted your practicum training
opportunities in the following areas:
Assessment Experience
High impact 530 24%
353 16%
Moderate impact 716 33%
333 15%
No impact 250 11%
Intervention Experience
High impact 258 12%
337 15%
Moderate impact 752 34%
516 24%
No impact 321 15%
Other Experiences
High impact 184 10%
238 13%
Moderate impact 715 39%
344 19%
No impact 350 19%
36. In future years, assuming there is NO PANDEMIC and SITES PAID FOR
YOUR TRAVEL EXPENSES to interview in person, which interview
format would you prefer?
Definitely Virtual 404 18%
394 18%
No Preference 302 14%
468 21%
Definitely in Person 620 28%
37. Based on what you know now, how likely are you to pursue the
following options for the year after internship:
A postdoctoral training program
Very likely to pursue 1253 57%
322 15%
Somewhat likely to pursue 400 18%
103 5%
Not at all likely to pursue 105 5%
Employment
Very likely to pursue 776 37%
344 16%
Somewhat likely to pursue 538 26%
260 12%
Not at all likely to pursue 186 9%
FEEDBACK ABOUT THE APPIC MATCH
In this section, please rate ONLY your experiences with the APPIC Match.
Please do NOT consider your experiences with the AAPI service
or any other aspect of this process.
38a. The materials and instructions provided by National Matching
Services (NMS) were clear and comprehensive.
Strongly Agree 986 46 %
Agree 981 45 %
Neutral 140 6 %
Disagree 39 2 %
Strongly Disagree 17 1 %
38b. The registration process with NMS went smoothly.
Strongly Agree 1249 58 %
Agree 805 37 %
Neutral 77 4 %
Disagree 21 1 %
Strongly Disagree 11 1 %
38c. The submission of my Rank Order List to NMS went smoothly.
Strongly Agree 1461 68 %
Agree 631 29 %
Neutral 43 2 %
Disagree 5 0 %
Strongly Disagree 9 0 %
38d. NMS was responsive to my questions and concerns
(leave blank if you never contacted NMS).
Strongly Agree 346 46 %
Agree 195 26 %
Neutral 197 26 %
Disagree 9 1 %
Strongly Disagree 9 1 %
38e. I am satisfied with the Match result that I received from
the Matching Program.
Strongly Agree 1269 59 %
Agree 486 23 %
Neutral 154 7 %
Disagree 93 4 %
Strongly Disagree 140 7 %
38f. Overall, I am satisfied with the APPIC Matching Program.
Strongly Agree 1025 48 %
Agree 711 33 %
Neutral 245 11 %
Disagree 102 5 %
Strongly Disagree 74 3 %
FEEDBACK ABOUT OTHER ISSUES
39a. My doctoral program faculty provided a high level of support
and assistance in the development of my AAPI Online applications
(e.g., provided information, gave me feedback on my essays, met
regularly).
Strongly Agree 747 35 %
Agree 701 33 %
Neutral 312 15 %
Disagree 247 11 %
Strongly Disagree 143 7 %
39b. My doctoral program faculty provided a high level of support and
assistance in preparing me for internship interviews (e.g.,
provided information, conducted role plays of interviews and
gave feedback; met regularly)
Strongly Agree 588 27 %
Agree 686 32 %
Neutral 382 18 %
Disagree 311 14 %
Strongly Disagree 182 8 %
40a. In your judgment, did you experience any violation(s) of
APPIC Match Policies by any site?
Yes 84 4 %
No 1938 90 %
Unsure 125 6 %
NOTE: Match Policy changes over the years may have influenced
responses to this item as compared to previous years' results.
40b. Did you reveal any ranking information (e.g., "You are my
first choice") to any site?
Yes 5 0 %
No 2122 99 %
Unsure 20 1 %
40c. Did you experience inappropriate pressure from any site to
reveal your rankings?
Yes 20 1 %
No 2105 98 %
Unsure 22 1 %
40d. Did any site reveal ranking information to you (e.g., "You
are our first choice")?
Yes 24 1 %
No 2094 98 %
Unsure 29 1 %
DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
Following are a series of questions that request personal demographic
information.
We are seeking your responses to these questions because from time to time we
are asked about the effect of various demographic factors on Match rates.
Since at no time in the application process do we collect this type
of information, we use this survey to more definitively understand the
potential impact of these factors on the internship selection process.
The information that you provide will remain ANONYMOUS and will be reported
in aggregate form only. While we hope that you will answer all of these
questions, you may skip any item that you do not feel comfortable
answering. However, the more responses that we receive, the more accurate
our data will be.
41. What is your age?
Mean = 30.0 Median = 29
SD = 5.2
Range = 23 to 69
42. How many dependent children are currently living with you?
None 1904 89%
1 136 6%
2 80 4%
3 21 1%
4 5 0%
5 or more 3 0%
43. How many adult dependents are currently living with you, or for
whom you are responsible? (DO include other relatives or
individuals, i.e., mother, father, grandparent, ward. DO NOT
include an able-bodied spouse/partner).
None 2027 95%
1 86 4%
2 16 1%
3 8 0%
4 1 0%
5 or more 0 0%
44. What is your current marital or relationship status?
Married / Partnered 1191 55 %
Not Married or Partnered 959 45 %
45. In which country(ies) do you hold citizenship? Individuals
with dual citizenship should designate all countries in which
citizenship is held.
U.S. 1934 90 %
Canada 150 7 %
Other 160 7 %
NOTE: Responses total greater than 100% due to dual citizenship.
46. What is your gender identity?
Woman 1735 81 %
Man 337 16 %
Genderqueer / Nonbinary 56 3 %
Trans Man 6 0 %
Trans Woman 4 0 %
Intersex 0 0 %
Prefer to self-identify 11 1 %
47. What is your racial/ethnic identification? (Check all
that apply)
African-American / Black 199 9 %
American Indian / Alaskan Native 25 1 %
Asian / Pacific Islander 236 11 %
Hispanic / Latino 245 11 %
White (Non-Hispanic) 1466 69 %
Bi-racial / Multi-racial 125 6 %
Other 75 4 %
48. What is your sexual orientation?
Lesbian / Gay 123 6 %
Straight 1585 74 %
Bisexual 312 15 %
Prefer to self-identify 109 5 %
49. What types of disability(ies) do you have? Check all
that apply. (If none, please check “None”)
None 1462 72 %
Blind / Visually Impaired 13 1 %
Deaf / Hard of Hearing 18 1 %
Physical / Orthopedic Disability 37 2 %
Learning Disability 78 4 %
Cognitive Disability 26 1 %
Chronic Health Condition 198 10 %
Mental Illness 314 15 %
Other 53 3 %
50. Many students have specific life situations and personal
needs for their internship year -- for example, accommodations
for disabilities, visa issues for international students,
flexible work hours due to medical or other issues, family
leave, child care, etc. One of the challenges faced by these
students is whether or not to disclose or discuss their
situations with internship sites. If you faced some of these
issues during the internship selection process, we would
appreciate your responding to the following items: (if you
did NOT experience such issues, please skip the entire
question)
[Used a 5-point scale, 5=Strongly Agree, 1=Strongly Disagree]
I was worried that disclosure of my situation 3.4
would result in bias or discrimination by sites
I wanted to discuss my situation with sites 3.1
so I could better understand the resources /
options that would be available
I disclosed/discussed my situation and needs 2.3
ON MY INTERNSHIP APPLICATIONS
I disclosed/discussed my situation and needs 2.4
DURING INTERVIEWS
Report Prepared by Greg Keilin, Ph.D.
August 25, 2023