Internships / Match / Match Statistics / Match Statistics 2016 Combined

Match Statistics 2016 Combined

2016 APPIC Match Statistics
Combined Results: Phase I and Phase II

March 21, 2016
Corrected April 5, 2016

 

This report provides statistics and information about the combined results for both phases of the 2016 APPIC Match.

Here is a summary of the numbers of applicants and positions in 2016 as compared to the last four APPIC Matches, combining both Phase I and Phase II:


    ------------------------------------   COMBINED PHASE I / PHASE II   ------------------------------------
   
2012 MATCH
2013 MATCH 2014 MATCH 2015 MATCH 2016 MATCH
 
Applicants: Registered for the Match
4,435
4,481 4,335 4,247 3,999
Withdrew or did not submit ranks
368
367 294 242 185
Matched
3,152
3,326 3,458 3,569 3,595
Unmatched
915
788 583 436 219
   
Positions: Offered in Phase I or Phase II
3,202
3,397 3,534 3,701 3,812
  Withdrew or no ranks in Phase II
32
52 37 49 70
  Filled
3,152
3,326 3,458 3,569 3,595
  Unfilled
18
19 39 83 147

APPLICANTS


PARTICIPATION - COMBINED PHASE I/II
Applicants Registered in the Match
3,999
Applicants Who Withdrew or Did Not Submit Ranks
185
Applicants Participating in the Match
3,814

 

MATCH RESULTS - COMBINED PHASE I/II
Applicants Matched*
3,595
(94%)
Participating Applicants Not Matched
219
( 6%)


INTERNSHIP PROGRAMS


PARTICIPATION: COMBINED PHASE I/II
Training Sites Participating in the Match
784
Programs Participating in the Match
1,452
Positions Offered in the Match
3,812

NOTE: A training site can offer more than one "program" in the Match. Each "program" was identified in the Match by a separate 6-digit code number.

NOTE: Due to a calculation error, the number of participating internship sites was corrected from 785 to 784 in the table above (April 5, 2016).


MATCH RESULTS - PROGRAMS - COMBINED PHASE I/II
Filled in Either Phase I or Phase II
1,318
(91%)
Withdrawn or No Ranks in Phase II
29
(2%)
Remaining Unfilled in Phase II
105
(7%)

NOTE: Programs that submitted a Rank Order List in Phase II with fewer ranks than positions available were counted as "unfilled".


MATCH RESULTS - POSITIONS - COMBINED PHASE I/II
Filled in Either Phase I or Phase II*
3,595
(94%)
Withdrawn or No Ranks in Phase II
70
(2%)
Remaining Unfilled in Phase II
147
(4%)

NOTE: For programs that submitted a Rank Order List in Phase II with fewer ranks than positions available, the positions without ranks were counted as "no ranks" rather than "unfilled" (e.g., a program submitting 1 rank for 3 positions would have 2 positions counted as "no ranks").


APA- OR CPA- ACCREDITED POSITIONS - COMBINED PHASE I/II
Filled in Either Phase I or Phase II
2,934
(98%)
Withdrawn or No Ranks in Phase II
13
(0%)
Remaining Unfilled in Phase II
34
(1%)
Total
2,981


NON-ACCREDITED POSITIONS - COMBINED PHASE I/II
Filled in Either Phase I or Phase II
661
(80%)
Withdrawn or No Ranks in Phase II
57
(7%)
Remaining Unfilled in Phase II
113
(14%)
Total
831


ADDITIONAL STATISTICS


APPLICANT RESULTS BY DOCTORAL PROGRAM TYPE AND DEGREE
COMBINED PHASE I/II
PROGRAM TYPE
DEGREE SOUGHT
MATCHED
UNMATCHED
WITHDREW OR NO RANKINGS SUBMITTED
TOTAL
Clinical
Ph.D. / Ed.D.
1,331
91.8%
66
4.6%
53
3.7%
1,450
Psy.D.
1,572
90.6%
98
5.6%
65
3.7%
1,735
TOTALS
2,903
91.1%
164
5.1%
118
3.7%
3,185
Counseling
Ph.D. / Ed.D.
360
90.2%
18
4.5%
21
5.3%
399
Psy.D.
68
74.7%
10
11.0%
13
14.3%
91
TOTALS
428
87.3%
28
5.7%
34
6.9%
490
School
Ph.D. / Ed.D.
163
83.2%
12
6.1%
21
10.7%
196
Psy.D.
17
53.1%
11
34.4%
4
12.5%
32
TOTALS
180
78.9%
23
10.1%
25
11.0%
228
Combined
Ph.D. / Ed.D.
45
91.8%
1
2.0%
3
6.1%
49
Psy.D.
39
83.0%
3
6.4%
5
10.6%
47
TOTALS
84
87.5%
4
4.2%
8
8.3%
96
ALL PROGRAMS
Ph.D. / Ed.D.
1,899
90.7%
97
4.6%
98
4.7%
2,094
Psy.D.
1,696
89.0%
122
6.4%
87
4.6%
1,905
TOTALS
3,595
89.9%
219
5.5%
185
4.6%
3,999

NOTE: Students seeking Ed.D. degrees were included in the Ph.D. category in order to prevent individuals from being identified.



APPLICANT RESULTS BY DOCTORAL PROGRAM ACCREDITATION STATUS AND PROGRAM TYPE
COMBINED PHASE I/II
ACCREDITATION STATUS OF DOC. PROG.
PROGRAM TYPE
MATCHED
UNMATCHED
WITHDREW OR NO RANKINGS SUBMITTED
TOTAL
Accredited
Clinical
2,757
92.5%
145
4.9%
80
2.7%
2,982
Counseling
374
91.7%
17
4.2%
17
4.2%
408
School
154
85.1%
15
8.3%
12
6.6%
181
Combined
71
92.2%
2
2.6%
4
5.2%
77
TOTALS
3,356
92.0%
179
4.9%
113
3.1%
3,648
Non-Accredited
Clinical
146
71.9%
19
9.4%
38
18.7%
203
Counseling
54
65.9%
11
13.4%
17
20.7%
82
School
26
55.3%
8
17.0%
13
27.7%
47
Combined
13
68.4%
2
10.5%
4
21.1%
19
TOTALS
239
68.1%
40
11.4%
72
20.5%
351
ALL PROGRAMS
Clinical
2,903
91.1%
164
5.1%
118
3.7%
3,185
Counseling
428
87.3%
28
5.7%
34
6.9%
490
School
180
78.9%
23
10.1%
25
11.0%
228
Combined
84
87.5%
4
4.2%
8
8.3%
96
TOTALS
3,595
89.9%
219
5.5%
185
4.6%
3,999


MATCHED APPLICANTS BY ACCREDITATION STATUS OF INTERNSHIP AND DOCTORAL PROGRAMS
COMBINED PHASE I/II
DOCTORAL PROGRAM ACCREDITATION STATUS
MATCHED TO ACCREDITED INTERNSHIP
MATCHED TO NON-ACCREDITED INTERNSHIP
TOTAL
Accredited
2,867
85.4%
489
14.6%
3,356
Non-Accredited
67
28.0%
172
72.0%
239
ALL PROGRAMS
2,934
81.6%
661
18.4%
3,595


MATCHED APPLICANTS BY ACCREDITATION STATUS OF INTERNSHIP PROGRAM
AND DOCTORAL PROGRAM TYPE AND DEGREE
COMBINED PHASE I/II
PROGRAM TYPE
DEGREE SOUGHT
MATCHED TO ACCREDITED INTERNSHIP
MATCHED TO NON-ACCREDITED INTERNSHIP
TOTAL
Clinical
Ph.D. / Ed.D.
1,250
93.9%
81
6.1%
1,331
Psy.D.
1,107
70.4%
465
29.6%
1,572
TOTALS
2,357
81.2%
546
18.8%
2,903
Counseling
Ph.D. / Ed.D.
333
92.5%
27
7.5%
360
Psy.D.
28
41.2%
40
58.8%
68
TOTALS
361
84.3%
67
15.7%
428
School
Ph.D. / Ed.D.
147
90.2%
16
9.8%
163
Psy.D.
7
41.2%
10
58.8%
17
TOTALS
154
85.6%
26
14.4%
180
Combined
Ph.D. / Ed.D.
40
88.9%
5
11.1%
45
Psy.D.
22
56.4%
17
43.6%
39
TOTALS
62
73.8%
22
26.2%
84
ALL PROGRAMS
Ph.D. / Ed.D.
1,770
93.2%
129
6.8%
1,899
Psy.D.
1,164
68.6%
532
31.4%
1,696
TOTALS
2,934
81.6%
661
18.4%
3,595

NOTE: Students seeking Ed.D. degrees were included in the Ph.D. category in order to prevent individuals from being identified.



*NOTE: Due to unusual circumstances, one applicant who matched in Phase I was released from the Match commitment by APPIC. The applicant was eligible to participate in Phase II and the vacated position was added into Phase II. When combining results, the applicant and position were considered to be not matched in Phase I.


Report Prepared by Greg Keilin, Ph.D.
and National Matching Services, Inc.
March 21, 2016